|
||||||||||
|
du Preez, B.; Loveridge, A.J.; MacDonald, D.W. | |
Making the best of camera-trap surveys in an imperfect world: a reply to Balme et al | |
2014 Biological Conservation (179): 146-147 | |
Big cats are wide-ranging and occur at low densities; consequently, confidence in the results of traditional camera-trap surveys is generally limited by low capture rates. However, by using bait, we recorded 645 independent detections in a single 50-day baited camera-trap survey, whilst unbaited surveys at the same site yielded only 111 detections over the same period (du Preez et al., 2014). Baiting increases capture frequency and capture probability - both of which are fundamental parameters for calculating accurate and precise population density estimates. Furthermore, our findings suggested that cubs and camera-shy individuals, which remained undetected in unbaited camera-trap surveys, were more likely to be recorded in baited surveys. |
|
PDF files are only accessible to Friends of the Cat Group. Joining Friends of the Cat Group gives you unlimited access and downloads in the Cat SG Library for one year, and allows you to receive our newsletter Cat News (2 regular issues per year plus special issues). More information how to join here |
(c) IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group ( IUCN - The World Conservation Union) |