|
||||||||||
|
Scheel, D. | |
Watching for lions in the grass: the usefulness of scanning and its effects during hunts | |
1993 Animal Behaviour (46): 695-704 | |
Scan rates of eight species of common ungulate prey of the African lion, _Panthera leo_, were measured in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, to examine the effect of predation risk on vigilance. Vigilance was measured both during lion hunts and when lions were not present. Risk of predation was expected to vary with herd size, prey species and density, available light and cover, predator presence and predator activity. Risk was expected to decline in large herds due to dilution. Over all prey species, vigilance declined with increasing group size for three measures of herd size: (1) total herd size, (2) numbers of conspecifics and (3) number of heterospecifics in a herd. Species that were at high predation risk (measured as hunts recorded per herd seen) had low vigilance. Risk was expected to be high near dense cover and when predators were most active. Wildebeests, _Connochaetes taurinus_, and zebras, _Equus burchelli_, scanned more when lions were most active. However, wart hogs, _Phacocheroerus aithiopicus_, and wildebeests scanned less where more cover was available for lions. These results suggest that scan rates vary not only with predation risk, but also with the utility of scanning. Lions did not appear to adjust their stalking behaviour according to the vigilance of the prey group. |
|
PDF files are only accessible to Friends of the Cat Group. Joining Friends of the Cat Group gives you unlimited access and downloads in the Cat SG Library for one year, and allows you to receive our newsletter Cat News (2 regular issues per year plus special issues). More information how to join here |
(c) IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group ( IUCN - The World Conservation Union) |