IUCN / SSC Cat Specialist Group - Digital Cat Library
   

 

View printer friendly
Kamler, J.F.; Richardson, C.; Gipson, P.S.
Comparison of standard and modified soft catch traps for capturing coyotes, bobcats, and raccoons
2000  Conference Proceeding

Capture rates and injury rates of coyotes (_Canis latrans_), bobcats {_Lynx rufus_), and raccoons (_Procyon lotor_) captured in standard No. 3 Soft Catch© traps were compared to those captured in the same trap type modified with the Taos Lightening SpringT (TLS) double torsion spring. All traps were equipped with Paws-I-TripT pan tension devices and were successful in excluding most small nontarget species. We captured 15 coyotes and 17 bobcats from October 1995 to March 1997. In addition, 23 raccoons, a large nontarget species, were captured. Capture rates for coyotes were higher (P < 0.10) in TLS modified traps (92%) than standard traps (27%), whereas capture rates were similar (P > 0.10) for raccoons (85% and 67%, respectively) and identical for bobcats (100%). Injury rates were minimal (< 9%) for coyotes and bobcats in both types of traps. In contrast, injury rates for raccoons were higher (P < 0.10) in TLS modified traps (73%) than standard traps (33%).

PDF files are only accessible to Friends of the Cat Group. Joining Friends of the Cat Group gives you unlimited access and downloads in the Cat SG Library for one year, and allows you to receive our newsletter Cat News (2 regular issues per year plus special issues). More information how to join here

 

(c) IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group ( IUCN - The World Conservation Union)